The Effects of Animacy and Complexity on the Morphosyntactic Acquisition of English Genitives by Jordanian Arabic Speakers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes1254

Keywords:

animacy, English genitive, feature reassembly, L1-Jordanian Arabic L2-, English speakers, morphosyntactic development, structural complexity

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of semantic and structural factors on the second language acquisition of English genitive constructions by Jordanian Arabic speakers. The study used two tasks: an Acceptability Judgement Task (AJT) and an Elicited Production Task (EPT). In both tasks, possessors varied in animacy (animate vs. inanimate) and complexity (simple vs. complex possessors). A control group of native English speakers showed a strong preference for the ’s-genitive in animate contexts and the of-genitive in inanimate ones, with only mild effects of structural complexity. The L2 group showed the same overall preferences, but their responses were more gradient and showed stronger sensitivity to possessor complexity. In the AJT, ratings for the ’s-genitive dropped notably in Animate–Complex contexts, whereas in the EPT, the L2 group produced the of-genitive at high rates across all conditions. Proficiency had a selective effect: more advanced learners were more target-like mainly in the complex-possessor contexts where English and Jordanian Arabic differ most. These findings support the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis, suggesting that semantic cues are acquired earlier and more robustly than the structural mechanisms underlying the English ’s-genitive. The difference between judgement and production shows that learners may recognise the target forms before they can produce them easily.

Author Biographies

Alaa Al-Maani, Al al-Bayt University, Jordan

 (Assistant Professor) – Corresponding Author

Department of English Language and Literature, Al al-Bayt University, Jordan

Email: alaa.maani@aabu.edu.jo

Majd Abushunar, The Hashemite University, Jordan

(Lecturer)

Language Center, The Hashemite University, Jordan

Email: majd@hu.edu.jo

Majid Tarawneh, Qatar Foundation, Qatar

(Assistant Professor)

Qatar Foundation, Qatar.

Email: maltarawneh@qf.org.qa

Wajed Al Ahmad, Al-Balqa Applied University, Jordan

(Assistant Professor)

Department of English Language, Al-Balqa Applied University, Jordan.

Email: wajdrasmiahmad@bau.edu.jo

References

Abdel-Aziz, Haneen, Marwan Jarrah, Abdel Rahman M. Altakhaineh and Ekab Al-Shawashreh. (2024). ‘A variationist approach to NP genitive alternatives in Arabic’. Kervan – International Journal of Afro-Asiatic Studies, 28(1): 169-201. https://doi.org/10.13135/1825-263X/10039

Abushunar, Majd and Rema Othman. (2022). ‘A syntactic study of adjectives in Jordanian Arabic’. Language in India, 22(6): 1-9.

Algie, James. (2023). L1 transfer in the L2 acquisition and processing of the English genitive alternation: Combining learner corpus and psycholinguistic methodologies. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK

Al-Maani, Alaa, Baraah AlAbabneh, Bassil Mashaqba and Anas Huneety. (2024a). ‘Investigating second language learning strategies using Think Aloud Protocols: Evidence from Jordanian EFL learners’. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2): 12-22.

Al-Maani, Alaa, Shayne Sloggett, Nino Grillo and Heather Marsden. (2024b). ‘Testing for proficiency effects and crosslinguistic influence in L2 processing: Filler-gap dependencies in L2 English by Jordanian Arabic and Mandarin speakers’. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(2): 564-580. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312400007X

Azaz, Mahmoud. (2020). ‘Structural surface overlap and derivational complexity in cross-linguistic transfer: Acquisition of English genitive alternation by Egyptian Arabic-speaking learners’. Second Language Research, 36(4): 529-556. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765831983486

Biber, Douglas, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, Randi Reppen and Tove Larsson. (2023). ‘Expanding the scope of grammatical variation: Towards a comprehensive account of genitive variation across registers’. English Language and Linguistics, 28(1): 95-133.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674323000497

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey N. Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. (1986). An Introduction to English Prosody. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Deshors, Sandra and Stefan Gries. (2014). ‘A case for the multifactorial assessment of learner language: The uses of may and can in French-English interlanguage’. In Dylan Glynn and Justyna Robinson (eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy, 179-204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dubois, Tanguy, Jason Grafmiller, Magali Paquot and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. (2023). ‘Animacy effects in the English genitive alternation: comparing native speakers and EFL learner judgments with corpus data’. Language and Cognition, 16 (3): 624–646. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2023.51

Dubois, Tanguy, Magali Paquot and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. (2022). ‘Alternation phenomena and language proficiency: The genitive alternation in the spoken language of EFL learners’. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 19(3): 427-450. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2021-0078

Escobar-Álvarez, María A. (2012). ‘The adult L2 acquisition of the Saxon genitive: Italian and Spanish results’. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 25: 43-69.

Fassi-Fehri, Abdelkader. (1999). ‘Arabic modifying adjectives and DP structures’. Studia Linguistica, 53(2): 105-154.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00042

Fassi-Fehri, Abdelkader. (1989). ‘Generalised IP structure, case, and vs word order’. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 10: 75–111.

Gil, Brenda H. (2014). An empirical study about the expression of possession in L2 English. Unpublished BA Thesis, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain.

Hinrichs, Lars and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. (2007). ‘Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora’. English Language and Linguistics, 11(3): 437-474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674307002341

Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jakubowicz, Celia. (2011). ‘Measuring derivational complexity: New evidence from typically developing and SLI learners of L1 French’. Lingua, 121(3): 339-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.006

Krashen, Stephen D. (1977). ‘Some issues relating to the Monitor Model’. In Henry D. Brown, Charles A. Yorio and Richard H. Crymes (eds.), On TESOL ’77: Teaching and Learning English as a Second language: Trends in Research and Practice, 144-158. Washington, DC: TESOL.

Lardiere, Donna. (2008). ‘Feature-assembly in second language acquisition’. In Juana Muñoz‑Liceras, Helmut Zobl and Helen Goodluck (eds.), The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, 107-140. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lardiere, Donna. (2009). ‘Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition’. Second Language Research, 25(2): 173-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100283

Oxford University Press, University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate and Association of Language Testers in Europe. (2001). Quick Placement Test: Paper and Pen Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Prévost, Philippe and Lydia White. (2000). ‘Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement’. Second Language Research, 16(2): 103-133.

https://doi.org/10.1191/026765800677556046

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

R Core Team. (2025). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from:

https://www.R-project.org/.

Ritter, Elizabeth. (1988). ‘A head movement approach to construct state noun phrases’. Linguistics, 26(6): 909-929.

https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1988.26.6.909

Romano, Francesco. (2016). ‘Syntactic planning of English genitives in L1 and L2 production: The Animacy Rule Model’. Lingua, 184(184): 104-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINGUA.2016.06.004

Rosenbach, Anette. (2005). ‘Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English’. Language, 81(3): 613-644.

Rosenbach, Anette. (2014). ‘English genitive variation: The state of the art’. English Language and Linguistics, 18(2): 215–262.

Rosenbach, Anette. (2002). Genitive Variation in English: Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.

Rosenbach, Anette. (2001). ‘The English s-genitive: Animacy, topicality, and possessive relationship in a diachronic perspective’. In Laurel Brinton (ed.), Historical linguistics: 277-292. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Schwartz, Bonnie D. and Rex A. Sprouse. (1996). ‘L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model’. Second Language Research, 12(1): 40-72.

Shih, Stephanie, Jason Grafmiller, Richard Futrell and Joan Bresnan. (2015). ‘Rhythm’s role in genitive construction choice in spoken English’. In Ralf Vogel and Ruben van de Vijver (eds.), Rhythm in Cognition and Grammar: A Germanic Perspective, 207-234. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378092.207

Zakrocka, Aleksandra. (2016). The English genitive: Preferences of the students of English for the variants of genitive case marking. Unpublished BA Thesis, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.

Downloads

Date of Publication

2026-06-07

Versions

How to Cite

Al-Maani, A., Abushunar, M., Tarawneh, M., & Al Ahmad, W. (2026). The Effects of Animacy and Complexity on the Morphosyntactic Acquisition of English Genitives by Jordanian Arabic Speakers. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 26(2), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes1254

Issue

Section

Table of Contents
Received 2025-12-13
Accepted 2026-05-17
Published 2026-05-20