Strategic Maneuvering in The Guardian and The Financial Times: A Comparative Critical Stylistic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes927Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, critical stylistics, opinion articles, strategic maneuveringAbstract
This study examines strategic maneuvering in 14 online articles on artificial intelligence in The Guardian and The Financial Times. The study explores how the different writers employ the three aspects of strategic maneuvering, namely topical potential, audience demand, and presentational devices. The data are carefully selected
and have specific criteria as the articles are only argumentative opinion articles on artificial intelligence covering the span of four years as of 2020 till 2023. To this end, the study relies on Van Eemeren’s (2018) model of strategic maneuvering along with Van Eemeren, Grootendorst and Henkemans’ (2002) taxonomy of fallacies, Wodak and Meyer’s (2001) taxonomy of topoi, van Dijk’s (2012) argumentative moves, and Jeffries’ (2010) critical stylistic model. The article fills a gap in the literature by integrating argumentation
and critical stylistics. In addition, the researcher suggests specific elements to explore the audience demand aspect and the presentational devices aspect. Results show that the two newspapers balance between reasonableness and effectiveness by making certain topical choices, meeting the audience’s preferences and utilizing suitable presentational devices. Besides, the writers keep warning the readers of the negative side and potential dangers of artificial intelligence which stresses their disapproval of unplanned automation.
References
Al-Hindawi, Fareed H. and Basim J. Kadhim. (2022). ‘Audience demands as a strategic maneuver in Imam Al-Hassan's speech after his Truce with Muaawiya’. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(5): 242-252. DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.5.27
El-Zouka, Marwa M. Kh. (2019). ‘Strategic maneuvering in argumentative confrontations: A pragma-dialectical analysis of Mark Zuckerberg's congressional hearings’. Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts, Alexandria University, 69(96): 1-33. 10.21608/bfalex.2019.150414
Hamad, Hiba M. and Hussein M. Al-Nasrawi. (2022). ‘A critical stylistic analysis of digital addiction in British newspapers’. Baltic Journal of Law and Politics, 15(7): 1136-1147.
Hussein, Abbas L. and Raad Mohammed Hussein. (2021). ‘Speaking loudly: Critical stylistic analysis of selected soliloquies in Hamlet’. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(6): 183-195. DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.6.21
Jeffries, Lesley. (2010). Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Basingtone: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jeffries, Lesley. (2014). ‘Critical stylistics’. In Michael Burke (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, 408-420. New York: Routledge.
Jeffries, Lesley. (2016). ‘Critical stylistics’. In Violeta Sotirova (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, 157-176. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Keinpointner, Manfred. (2013). ‘Strategic maneuvering in the political rhetoric of Barack Obama’. Journal of Language and Politics, 12(3): 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.03kie
Nadeem, Nahla. (2023). ‘Exploring TED speakers’ narrative positioning from a strategic maneuvering perspective: A single case study from Winch’s (2014) TED talk’. Argumentation, 37: 437-472.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09597-7
Olaluwoye, Layo. (2015). ‘A critical stylistic analysis of the identity of minority
groups in the Nigerian print media’. Journal of Literature, Languages and
Linguistics, 16: 87-93.
Rivolta, Stefano Mario. (2011). Strategic maneuvering and media bias in political news magazine opinion articles: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sarhan, Nihal N. (2023). ‘A critical stylistic analysis of ideologies of masculinity
and femininity in Folktales of Egypt (1980)’. Journal of Scientific Research in Arts (Language and Literature), 24(1): 36-61. DOI: 10.21608/jssa.2023.166531.1434
Van Dijk, Teun. (2012). Ideology and Discourse: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra University.
Van Eemeren, Franz. H. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Eemeren, Franz. H. (2018). Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. Switzerland: Springer.
Van Eemeren, Franz. H. and Peter Houtlosser (eds.). (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Van Eemeren, Franz. H., Rob Grootendorst and A. Francisca S. Henkemans. (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer. (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
