The Muslim “Hajji” as a Catalyst of Unraveling Imperialist Discursive Laundering in Rudyard Kipling’s “A Deal in Cotton”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v25i2.906Keywords:
discursive laundering, imperialism, materialism, Muslims, Rudyard KiplingAbstract
The current study aims to investigate the discursive dynamics that account for prolonging the imperial enterprise in one of Kipling’s usually overlooked texts, “A Deal in Cotton” (1907). The uniqueness of this tale lies in exhibiting the ideological basis whereby the imperial practices in African colonies are rationalized. This ideology is exhaustively materialistic as imperial officials do not refrain from commercializing all that is at their disposal. However, drawing on a Foucauldian theoretical framework, the study unveils the intricate processes wherein such imperial practices become intertwined with the enigmatic character of Ibn Makarrah, whose presence exclusively enables the imperialists to proceed in their imperial undertaking. Because Ibn Makarrah happens to be their perilous, powerful adversary, imperial officials tend to discursively obliterate, recycle, and reintroduce him as a painstakingly different character who is simply dubbed the “Hajji” and whose ensuing characterization is discursively permissible. This shadowy process, which the study labels “discursive laundering,” allows Adam to springboard into securing the funds, land, and labor power required for his materialist project. The importance of the study’s findings lies in uncovering the narrative mechanisms whereby anti-discursive constructs are converted into discursively legitimate ones in a way that reinforces imperialism in the story.
References
Bates, Herbert E. (1941). The Modern Short Story: A Critical Survey. Boston: The Writer, Inc.
Besant, Sir W. (1971). ‘Is it the voice of the hooligan?’ In Roger Lancelyn Green (ed.), Kipling: The Critical Heritage, 250-259. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1900).
Buchanan, Robert. (1965). ‘From the voice of the hooligan’. In Elliot L. Gilbert (ed.), Kipling and the Critics, 20-32. New York: New York UP. (Original work published 1900).
Carrington, Charles. (1955). Rudyard Kipling: His Life and Work. London: Macmillan.
Crook, Nora. (1989). Kipling’s Myths of Love and Death. New York: Plagrave Macmillan.
Dobrée, Bonamy. (1964). The Lamp and the Lute: Studies in Seven Authors. London: Frank Cass.
Eliot, Thomas S. (1941). A Choice of Kipling’s Verse. London: Faber.
Ford, Boris. (1965). ‘A case for Kipling?’ In Elliot L. Gilbert (ed.), Kipling and the Critics, 59-73. New York: New York UP. (Original work published 1942).
Foucault, Michel. (1970). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Random House.
Foucault, Michel. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
Foucault, Michel. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 (Colin Gordon, Ed.; Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham, and Kate Soper, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
Foucault, Michel. (1981). ‘The order of discourse’. In Robert Young (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, 48-78. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Gilbert, Elliot L. (1965). ‘Introduction’. In Elliot L. Gilbert (ed.), Kipling and the Critics, v-xviii. New York: New York UP.
Hopton, Doug. (2009). Money Laundering: A Concise Guide for All Business. London: Routledge.
Kipling, Rudyard. (1909). ‘A deal in cotton’. In Rudyard Kipling, Actions and Reactions, 187-212. New York: Doubleday. (Original work published 1907).
Kipling, Rudyard. (1910). ‘Slaves of the lamp part II’. In Rudyard Kipling, Stalky & Co, 246-272. London: Macmillan. (Original work published 1897).
Kipling, Rudyard. (1915a). ‘The mark of the beast’. In Rudyard Kipling, Life’s Handicap (Vol.2), 33-55. London: Macmillan. (Original work published 1890).
Kipling, Rudyard. (1915b). ‘Without benefit of clergy’. In Rudyard Kipling, Life’s Handicap (Vol.1), 177-215. London: Macmillan. (Original work published 1890).
Kipling, Rudyard. (1923). ‘The son of his father’. In Rudyard Kipling, Land and Sea Tales, 219-251. London: Macmillan. (Original work published 1893).
Krunz, Fida’ I. and Shadi S. Neimneh. (2021). ‘The return of the primal father: A comparative Freudian reading of two novels’. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 21 (2): 147-164.
https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.21.2.8
Lang, Andrew. (1891). ‘Mr. Kipling’s stories’. In Andrew Lang (ed.), Essays in Little, 198-205. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Lessambo, Felix I. (2023). Anti-Money Laundering, Counter Financing Terrorism and Cybersecurity in the Banking Industry: A Comparative Study Within the G-20. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Macaulay, Thomas B. (1871). ‘Lord Macaulay’s minute’. In W. Nassau Lees, Indian Musalmáns: Being Three Letters Reprinted from the “Times,” with an Article on the Late Prince Consort and Four Articles on Education, Reprinted from the “Calcutta Englishman,” 87-104. London: Williams and Norgate. (Original work published 1835).
McClure, John A. (1981). Kipling and Conrad: The Colonial Fiction. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Moore-Gilbert, Bart J. (1986). Kipling and “Orientalism.” New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Orwell, George. (1964). ‘Rudyard Kipling’. In Andrew Rutherford (ed.), Kipling’s Mind and Art, 70-84. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. (Original work published 1942).
Parry, Benita. (1993). ‘The content and discontents of Kipling’s imperialism’. In Erica Carter, James Donald, and Judith Squires (eds.), Space and Place: Theories of Identity and Location, 221-240. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Pinto, Vivian de Sola. (1951). Crisis in English Poetry 1880-1940. London: Hutchinson’s University Library.
Said, Edward W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
Said, Edward W. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage.
Sandison, Alan. (1967). The Wheel of Empire: A Study of the Imperial Idea in Some Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth-Century Fiction. London: Macmillan.
Sandison, Alan. (1972). ‘A matter of vision: Rudyard Kipling and Rider Haggard’. In John Gross (ed.), Rudyard Kipling: The Man, his Work and his World, 127-134. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Scott, David. (2011). ‘Kipling, the Orient, and Orientals: “Orientalism” reoriented?’ Journal of World History, 22 (2): 299-328.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2011.0036
Spivak, Gayatri Ch. (1999). A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Sullivan, Kevin. (2023). Anti-Money Laundering in a Nutshell: Awareness and Compliance for Financial Personnel and Business Managers. Flowery Branch: Apress.
Talafha, Haitham M. A. (2011). Ghosts, madness, and dementia: The failure of the global capitalist enterprise in Joseph Conrad’s geopolitical peripheries. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Wells, Herbert G. (1921). The Outline of History: Being a Plain History of Life and Mankind. New York: Macmillan.
Wilde, Oscar. (1890). ‘The true function and value of criticism’. The Nineteenth Century, 28 (July-Dec.): 435- 459.
Wilson, Edmund. (1964). ‘The Kipling that nobody read’. In Andrew Rutherford (ed.), Kipling’s Mind and Art, 17-69. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd. (Original work published 1941).
