War of Terminologies in Israeli and Western Media: A Critical Media Discourse Study of Israel and Gaza War
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v25i2.691Keywords:
cognitive approach, critical discourse analysis, Israel and Gaza conflict, media discourses, socio- terminology, terrorist ideologyAbstract
The current study is a critical media discourse analysis of some Israeli and international Western newspapers and TV channels that cover the Israel and Gaza war after the events of October 7th. The data were selected from various influential Israeli and Western international newspapers and TV channels such as CNBC News, Middle East News, CNN, BBC News, The Guardian, The Times of Israel, Euro News, and The New York Times. News articles directly related to the war were selected and examined. The authors have adopted Van Dijk's socio-cognitive approach (1993) as a theoretical framework for analyzing both written and some spoken discourses. In this study, the socio-cognitive approach is employed to investigate how terminologies sustain dominant ideologies, marginalize groups, and trigger particular mental models that influence interpretations of the Israel-Gaza war. The findings revealed that the selected Israeli and Western newspapers and TV channels conveyed biased ideologies and political stances against Hamas and Palestinians in Gaza by employing specific terms and phrases to construct biased ideologies and legitimize the brutal violence against Gaza. The news frames Hamas as terrorists and aggressive enemies to Israel and national security. Moreover, the findings showed the biased political and ideological stances of newspapers in legitimizing the violence of Israel against civilians in Gaza, displacing Palestinians from their indigenous land, and constructing anti-Semitic ideology.
References
Abdulkadir, Aliyu U. (2023). ‘A critical discourse analysis of selected political interviews in Nigerian news media’. Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literary Studies, 3(2): 47-61. https://doi.org/10.57040/jllls.v3i2.432.
Alnwihe, Hamza K., and Linda S. Al-Abbas. (2023). ‘The representation of Gaza war (2021) in the official remarks of Hamas and Israel: A critical discourse study’. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(12):3311-3318.
https://tpls.academypublication.com/index.php/tpls/article/view/7039.
Amaireh, Hanan A. (2024). ‘A critical discourse analysis of Al Jazeera’s reporting of the 2021 Israel-Palestine crisis’. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies (IJAES), 24(1): 21-40.
https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v24i1.559.
Amer, Mohammed W. (2017). ‘Critical discourse analysis of war reporting in the international press: The case of the Gaza war of 2008–2009’. Palgrave Communications, 3(1): 1-11.
Amer, Mohammed Mosheer. (2022). “BBC and New York Times’ coverage of the May 2021 Israeli onslaught on Gaza: A critical discourse analysis’. International Journal of English Linguistics, 12(5): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.05.008.
Chilton, Paul and Christina Schäffner. (1997). ‘Discourse and politics.’ Discourse as Social Interaction, 2: 206-230.
Darshan, BM. and Kalyani Suresh. (2019). ‘The ‘Social’ in political communication: Social media enabled political discourse, engagement and mobilization in India’. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4): 195-202. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7425.
Erdayani, Rizki, Syed Agung Afandi, Muslim Afandi, Hijratul Aswad and Nail H. Afandi. (2022). ‘Political competition in Riau: A review of critical discourse analysis’. Journal El-Riyasah, 13(1): 92-197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jel.v13i1.20901.
Fairclough, Isabela and Norman Fairclough. (2013). Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. New York: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman. (1989). Language and power. London, Longman
Fairclough, Norman. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, Norman. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
Fairclough, Norman. (2001). Language and Power. New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250
Fairclough, Norman. (2013). Language and Power. New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250.
Hamdan, Jihad M., Randa Naser and Hady Hamdan. (2021). ‘Arabic-English translation in the Palestinian–Israeli ‘conflict’: Ideology in the wings.’ SKASE Journal of Translation and Interpretation, 14(2): 80-96
Hudson, Kenneth. (1978). The Language of Modern Politics. London: MacMillan.
Irfan, Irsa, Muhammad Aqeel and Muhammad S. Hussain. (2024). ‘Critical discourse analysis of Islamophobia reflection in Gaza-Israel conflict: A case study of BBC reporting’. Journal of Arts and Linguistics Studies, 2(1): 289-301. https://jals.miard.org/index.php/jals/article/view/97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.04.004.
KhosraviNik, Majid. (2022). ‘Digital meaning-making across content and practice in social media critical discourse studies.’ Critical Discourse Studies, 19(2): 119-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1835683
Lipstadt, Deborah E. (2019). Antisemitism: Here and Now. Berlin: Schocken.
Masalha, Nur. (1992). Expulsion of the Palestinians. Washington, DC: Institute for Palestine Studies.
Pavlichenko, Larysa. (2022). ‘Polarization in media political discourse on the war in Ukraine: Critical discourse analyses.’ Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology, 2(24): 214-223. DOI.10.32342/2523-4463-2022-2-24-18
Rababah, Alaa G. and Jihad M. Hamdan. (2019). ‘A Contrastive critical discourse analysis of Netanyahu's and Abbas's speeches on the Gaza war (2014)’. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(1): 178. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1001.20.
Tutar, Hasan. (2023). ‘Critical discourse analysis on leader statements in the Russia-Ukraine War’. Etkileşim, 11: 44-66.
https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2023.6.11.189.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1993). ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis.’ Discourse and Society, 4(2): 249-283.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1995). ‘Ideological discourse analysis.’ New Courant, 4(1): 135-161.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1997). ‘Cognitive context models and discourse’. In Maxim I. Stamenov (ed.), Language Structure, Discourse and the Access to Consciousness, 189-227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1998). ‘Opinions and ideologies in the press’. In Allan Bell and Peter Garrett (eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse, 21-63. Oxford: Blackwell
Van Dijk, Teun A. (2000). ‘New (s) racism: A discourse analytical approach’. Ethnic Minorities and the Media, 37(1): 33-49.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (2006). ‘Discourse and manipulation’. Discourse and Society, 17(3): 359-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (2016). ‘Discourse and racism: Some conclusions of 30 years of research’. In Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey (eds.), Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, 285-295. Berlin: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_10.
Wodak, Ruth. (2001). The Discourse-Historical Approach. London: Sage Publications Incorporated.
Wodak, Ruth. (2005). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wodak, Ruth. (2012). ‘Language, power and identity’. Language Teaching, 45(2): 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000048.
Yang, Hai and Baldwin Van Gorp. (2023). ‘A frame analysis of political-media discourse on the Belt and Road Initiative: Evidence from China, Australia, India, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 36(5): 625-651.
