Post-colonial Counter-memory in The Trial of Dedan Kimathi: (Re)membering the Demonized Hero and Subverting the Colonial Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v24i1.557Keywords:
counter-memory, Ian Henderson, Micere Githae-Mugo, Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, Post-colonial Drama, The Trial of Dedan KimathiAbstract
This paper examines how Kenyan novelist and playwright Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o and Zimbabwean playwright Micere Githae-Mugo have embarked on a dramatic counter-discursive project through their play The Trial of Dedan Kimathi (1976). The researchers argue that the play was intended to subvert the many colonial historical accounts about the figure of Kimathi and the Mau Mau revolutionary anticolonial movement. Drawing upon post-colonial criticism, this paper demonstrates how the playwrights use the heroic fictional character of Kimathi to counteract several historical and fictional colonial and contemporary postcolonial accounts about this controversial freedom fighter. Then, the paper goes on to examine the role of Ian Henderson (the British colonial police officer who participated in the manhunt for Kimathi and succeeded in capturing him in 1957) as a fictional character in the play. While many studies have demonstrated that The Trial of Dedan Kimathi re-writes the colonial history about Kimathi and the Mau Mau movement in Kenya, which was maintained by Ian Henderson and many other colonial writers, to the best of the researchers’ knowledge; previous studies have not presented a comparative examination of both figures of Henderson, i.e., the historical figure and the fictional one. Here, the researchers explain how through the inclusion of the character of Henderson as the antagonist of the play, the dramatists subvert Henderson’s actual written accounts about Kimathi and the Kenyan national movement.
References
Amoko, Apollo. (2005). ‘The resemblance of colonial mimicry: A revisionary reading of Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o's “the river between”’. Research in African Literatures, 36(1): 34-50.
Amoko, Apollo.(2016). Postcolonialism in the Wake of the Nairobi revolution: Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o and the Idea of African literature. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Amuta, Chidi. (1989). Theory of African literature: Implications for practical criticism. London: Zed Institute for African Alternatives.
Associated Press. (12 September 2015). ‘Kenya unveils memorial to victims of torture in Mau Mau era’. The Telegraph.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/kenya/11861041/Kenya-unveils-memorial-to-victims-of-torture-in-Mau-Mau-era.html (Retrieved on 2 July, 2023).
Barnett, Donald and KarariNjama. (1966). Mau Mau from within: Autobiography and Analysis of Kenya's Peasant Revolt. New York: Monthly Review.
Björkman, Ingrid. (1989). Mother, Sing for Me: People's Theatre in Kenya. London, Atlantic Highlands, N.J., USA: Zed Books.
Brom, John. (1956). Mau-Mau. Paris: Amiot-Dumont.
Brown, Nicholas. (1999). ‘Revolution and recidivism: The problem of Kenyan history in the plays of Ngũgĩ waThiong'o’. Research in African Literatures,3(4): 56-73.
Brown, Nicholas. (2005). ‘Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o and pepetela: Revolution and retrenchment’. In Nicholas Brown (ed.), Utopian Generations: The Political Horizon of Twentieth-century Literature, 150-172. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Caminero-Santangelo, Byron. (1998). ‘Neocolonialism and the betrayal plot in Ngũgĩ waThiong’o’s revision of Under Western Eyes’. Research in African Literatures, 29(1):139-152.
Carothers, John. C. (1954). The Psychology of Mau Mau. Government Press.
Corfield, Frederik. (1960). Historical Survey of the Origins and Growth of Mau Mau. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
Diouf, ChristopheS. (2014). ‘The cultural resistance to missionary schools in Kenya: a study of Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o's The River Between and A Grain of Wheat’. Journal of Pan African Studies, 7(7): 26-35.
Elkins,Caroline. (2013, June 7). ‘Britain has said sorry to the Mau Mau. The rest of the empire is still waiting’. The Gaurdian.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jun/06/britain-maumau-empire-waiting(Retrieved on 27 February, 2020).
Foucault, Michel et al. (2003). “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège De France 1975-76. New York: Picador.
Gikandi, Simon.(2000). Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
Henderson, Ian andPhilip SirGoodhart (1958). Man hunt in Kenya. New York: Doubleday.
Hooper, Glenn. (1998). ‘History, historiography and self in Ngũgĩ’s petals of blood’. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 33(1): 47–62.
Hubert, Susan. (2001). ‘Cultural hybridity and social transformation in petals of blood and Burger's daughter’. The Midwest Quarterly, 43(1): 51-60.
Jameson, Fredric. (1986). ‘Third-World literature in the era of multinational capitalism’. Social Text, (15), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/466493 (Retrieved on 2 April, 2020).
Kessler, Kathy. (1994). ‘Rewriting history in fiction: Elements of postmodernism in Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o's later novels’. ARIEL, 25 (2):75-90.
Khawaldeh, Imad, BakerBani-Khair and Nisreen Al-Khawaldeh. (2017) ‘Recalling the past in postcolonial drama: From counter-history to sociopolitical redress’. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(5): 71-78.
Koroma, Yahyaet al.(2020). ‘Cohesion in African narrative: A linguistic study of racial discrimination and colonialism in a grain of wheat by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o’. Journal of Scientific Research in Arts, 21(1):69-114
Leigh, Ione. (1955). In the Shadow of the Mau Mau. London: W.H. Allen.
Lovesey, Oliver. (2000). Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o. New York: Twayne.
Lovesey, Oliver. (2002). ‘Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o'spostnation: The cultural geographies of colonial, neocolonial, and postnational space’. MFS Modern Fiction Studies 48(1): 139- 168.
Lovesey, Oliver. (2015). The Postcolonial Intellectual: Ngũgĩ waThiong’o in Context. London: Routledge,
Magel E. A. (1983). ‘Symbolism and regeneration in Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o's and Micere Mugo's The Trial of Dedan Kimathi’.Canadian Journal of African Studies, 17(2): 239-245. https://doi.org/10.2307/484216 (Retrieved on 7th June, 2020).
Mclaren, Joseph. (1998). ‘Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’s Moving the Centre and its relevance to Afrocentricity’. Journal of Black Studies, 28(3): 386–397.
Mitchell, Philip. (1954). African Afterthoughts. London: Hutchinson.
Mwangi, Meja. (1974). Carcase for Hounds. London: Heinemann Educational.
Mwetulundila, Rauna. (2016). ‘A Marxist analysis of Ngũgĩ waThiong’o’s novel’. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, 3(10): 26-32.
Nag, Sourav. ( 2013). ‘Fighting neocolonialism: A case study of the selected novels of Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’. Epiphany, 6(1):136-150.
Ndigirigi, Gĩchingiri.(2007). Ngũgĩ waThiong’o'sDrama and the Kamĩrĩĩthũ Popular Theater Experiment. Trenton, NJ: Africa World.
Nicholls, Brendon. (2010). Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, Gender, and the Ethics of Postcolonial Reading. London: Routledge.
Okunoye, Oyeniyi. (2001). ‘Dramatizing postcoloniality: Nationalism and the rewriting of history in Ngũgĩ and Mugo's The Trial of Dedan Kimathi’. History in Africa, 28: 225-237. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172216 (Retrieved on 27May, 2020).
Outa, George Odera. (2001). ‘The dramaturgy of power and politics in post-colonial Kenya: A comparative re-reading of 'forms', in texts by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o and Francis Imbuga’. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 10(3): 344-365.
Rawcliffe, D. H. (1954). The Struggle for Kenya. London: Gollancz.
Thiong’o, Ngũgĩ wa and Micere Githae-Mugo. (1976). The Trial of Dedan Kimathi. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Thiong’o, Ngũgĩwa. (1986). Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. London: Portsmouth, N.H : J. Currey; Heinemann
Thiong’o, Ngũgĩwa. (1993). Moving the Centre: The Struggle for Cultural Freedoms. London: J. Currey.
Said, Edward. (1994). Culture and Imperialism. New York: Knopf.
Samy, Steephan et al. (2019). ‘The portrayal of women characters in the novels of Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’. Journal of the Gujarat Research Society,21(10): 366-370.
Sicherman, Carol. (1995). ‘Ngũgĩ 's colonial education: The subversion of the African mind’. African Studies Review, 38(3):11-41.
https://doi.org/10.2307/524791 (Retrieved on 4 March, 2020).
Simatei, Peter. (1999). ‘Versions and inversions: Mau Mau in Kahiga's Dedan Kimathi: The real story’.Research in African Literatures, 30:154-161. https://doi.org/10.1353/ral.2005.0100 (Retrieved on 16 May, 2020).
Sithole, Tendayi. (2014). ‘Violence: The (un)real, power and excess in Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o's wizard of the crow’. Journal of Literary Studies, 30( 2):86-103.
Stoneham, Charles. (1953). Mau Mau. London: Museum Pr.
Taylor, Diana. (2003) The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Durham: Duke UP.
Tiffin, Helen. (1995). ‘Post-colonial literatures and counter-discourse’. In Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tiffin (Eds.), The Post-colonial Studies Reader, 95-98. London: Routledge.
Uwasomba, Chijioke. (2006). ‘The politics of resistance and liberation in Ngũgĩ waThiong'o's 'petals of blood' and 'devil on the cross'’. The Journal of Pan-African Studies, 1: 94-108.
Vashisht, Natasha. (2021) ‘Staging resistance matters! Deconstructing structures of power and oppression in Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o and Micere Githae-Mugo’s the Trial of Dedan Kimathi and Dario Fo’sAccidental Death of an Anarchist.’ African Identities,19 (4):1-15.
Wachira, Godwin. (1968). Ordeal in the Forest. Nairobi: East African Pub. House.
Wamweya, Joram. (1971.). Freedom Fighter. Nairobi: East African Pub. House.
Watene, Kenneth. (1974). Dedan Kimath: A Play. Nairobi: Transafrica.
