To Hedge or Not to Hedge: A Pragmatic Study of Hedging in Jordanian Arabic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v25i1.648Keywords:
compound hedging, depersonalization, fuzziness, hedging, Jordanian Arabic, subjectivity markersAbstract
This study aims to explore the frequency of use and types of hedging devices produced by Jordanian Arabic speakers. The study also seeks to ascertain the pragmatic functions of hedging in Jordanian Arabic. Two types of instruments are employed; a survey instructing the participants to provide some instances from their daily use of language, representing hedging as a linguistic device in Jordanian Arabic and notes of daily observations that take place between friends, colleagues, and family members. A total of 763 hedgers of all types are piled from the daily observations and the survey comprising 86 participants. The data are analyzed and transformed into numerical values in the form of percentages. The findings of the study depict that hedging is a common linguistic device, characterizing Jordanian Arabic and the commonest type is compound hedgers with 50% of the total instances. The findings also reveal that hedging performs various functions in Jordanian Arabic: interpersonal politeness, subjectivity markers, vagueness, fuzziness, and depersonalization. The study presents a novel syntactic categorization of hedging in Jordanian Arabic that differs from Modern Standard Arabic and English.
References
Al-Ghoweri, Helen and Al Kayed Murad. (2019). ‘A comparative study of hedges and boosters in English and Jordanian Arabic: Economic newspaper articles as a case study’. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(1): 52-59.
Al-Jazaeri, Walaa. (2017). Use of hedges by young females in Jordanian Arabic. MA thesis, Yarmouk University, Jordan.
Al-khawaldeh, Nisreen, and Abu Rahmeh, Luay. (2022). ‘The communication of viewpoints in Jordanian Arabic: a pragmatic study’. Open Linguistics, 8(1): 258-278.
Al-Mahameed, Yazan, Al-Aajalein, Mohammad and Ahmad, Khawla. (2018). ‘Causative-inchoative alternation in the language of Jordanian EFL learners’. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 7(6), 176-183.
Al-Mahameed, Yazan, Al Bataineh, Khaleel and Ammari, Raeda. (2022). ‘The use of passive voice in news reports for political purposes’. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13( 6): 1196-1202.
Almutairi, Mashael., Alkous, Nouf, and, Zitouni,Mimouna. (2022). ‘The uses and functions of Barack Obama’s hedging language in selected speeches’. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1): 73-84.
Al-Salami, Akram and Raheem, Saeed. (2021). ‘A socio-pragmatic study of hedging in Iraqi Arabic’. Psychology and Education, 58(1): 3599-3605.
Amine, Waleed. (2019). ‘A gender–based study of hedging in selected TV interviews in Arabic: A new approach to hedging’. CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Education, 66(2): 623-647.
Andriani, Fenty.(2019). ‘Hedging as a rhetorical strategy in political discourse’. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 3(1): 29-41.
Amin, Nasir. (2018). ‘Hedges in Arabic language that occurred in daily conversation in family domain’. Journal of English teaching and learning Issues, 1 (2): 116-133.
Badarneh, Muhammad. (2010). ‘The pragmatics of diminutives in colloquial Jordanian Arabic’. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(1):153-167.
Brown, Penelope, Levinson, Stephen. (2011). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cabanes, Paloma. (2007): ‘A Contrastive analysis of hedging in English and Spanish architecture projects descriptions’. Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20 (3), 139-156.
Chen, Chenghui and Zhang, Lawrance. (2016). ‘An intercultural analysis of the use of hedging by Chinese and Anglophone academic English writers’. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(1): 1–34
Crompton, Peter. (1997) ‘Hedging in academic writing: some theoretical aspects’. English for Specific Purposes, 16: 271-289.
Crompton, Peter. (1998). ‘Identifying hedges: Definition of divination?’. English for Specific Purposes, 17: 303-313.
Dornyei, Zlatan. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. UK. Oxford university press.
ElShiekh, Ahmad. (2013). ‘Euphemism, hedging or mystification of responsibility? An investigation into contemporary colloquial discourse with particular reference to taxi drivers & undergraduate university students in Egypt & Jordan’. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3(3), 88-99.
Fraser, Bruce. (2010). ‘Hedging in political discourse. Perspectives in politics and discourse’, 36: 201-213.
Hamdi, Sofie and Salman, Mohammad. (2020). ‘The hedging strategy of small Arab gulf states’. Asian Politics & Policy, 12(2):127-152.
Holmes, Janet. (1988). ‘Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks’. Applied linguistics, 9(1):21-44.
Hübler, Axel. (1983). Understatements and Hedges in English’. U.S. Library of Congress.
Hyland, Ken. (1998). ‘Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge’. Text & Talk, 18(3): 349-382.
Kheryadi, Abdul Muin and Syahid, Ahmad. (2022). ‘Hedges in English and Arabic metadiscourse utility in academic writing: A contrastive analysis’. Jurnal Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 14(2), 308-323.
Lakoff, George. (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of philosophical logic, 2(4), 458-508.
Lersen-freeman, D and long Michael. (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Longman.
Mansour, Enas and Alghazo, Shareef. (2021). ‘Hedging in political discourse: The case of Trump’s speeches’. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 13(3): 375-399.
Markkanen, Rajia and Schroder, Hartmut. (1997). Hedging and Discourse. New York. De Gruyter publications.
Markkanen, Rajia and Schroder, Hartmut. (2006). Hedging: a Challenge for Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis. Retrived February 6, 2012 from http://www.sw2.euv-frankfurto. de/Publikationen/hedging/markkane/markkane.html.
Myers, George. (1989). ‘The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles’. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1-35.
Nadhim, Akram. (2021). ‘A Socio-pragmatic Study of Hedging in Iraqi Arabic’. Psychology and Education Journal. 58 (4). 3599-3605.
Partington, Alan. (2003). The Linguistics of Political Argument: The Spin-Doctor and the Wolf-Pack at the White House. Routledge.
Prince, Frader, and Bosk,. (1982) On Hedging in Physician Discourse: Linguistics and the Professions. Alex Publishing Corporation, Norwood.
Rabab’ah, Ghaleb and Rumman, Ronza. (2015). ‘Hedging in Political Discourse: Evidence From the Speeches of King Abdullah II of Jordan’. Prague Journal of English Studies, 4(1):157-185.
Salager, Meyer. (1994). ‘Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse’. English for Specific Purposes 13(3):149-170.
Salager, Meyer. (1998) ‘Language is not a physical object’. English for Specific Purposes 17 (3):295-303.
Yule George. (2014) The Study of Language (5th edition). United States of America. Cambridge university press.
Taqi, Jummana. (2021). ‘Hedges in English and Arabic: A contrastive study’. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online, 20 (3): 604-614.
Taweel, Abeer and Saidat, Ahmad.(2011). ‘Hedging in Political Discourse’. Linguistics Journal, 5(1): 169-196.
Wilamová, Sirma. (2005). ‘On the function of hedging devices in negatively polite discourse’. Brno studies in English, 31(1),85-93.
Zakia, Anisa. (2018). Pragmatic study on hedging as politeness strategy in online newspaper. MA Thesis. State Islamic University Syarif Hindayatullah. Jakarta.
Zheng, hang. (2012). A Study of Pragmatic Functions of Linguistic Hedges in Utterance Production and Comprehension From the Perspective of Cognitive Pragmatics. Suzhou. Suzhou University Press.
Downloads
Date of Publication
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2024-06-05
Published 2024-07-11
